Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Trending
    • Are central bankers asking the right questions about “inflation?”
    • The Future of the Central Bank
    • Memo to Fed: Stop worrying about “inflation” beyond monetary control
    • Memo to Fed: Don’t mess with Mother Nature’s interest rates
    • Japan: Time to shift gears to climb to the next level of growth
    • Japan: Households shine in 2Q2018 – watch three threats to exports and households
    • Newest inflation report – 3 secrets revealed
    • No, productivity is not widely weak. Companies are dynamic.
    Fed Dashboard
    • Home
    • About Us
      • Our Purpose
      • Editorial Board
      • Thank you / Credit
      • Contact our writers
    • Economic Analysis
      • Employment
      • Wages & Salaries
      • Productivity
      • GDP
      • Production
      • Money & Prices
      • Exponential Tech
      • Imports & Exports
      • Consumer Credit
      • Business Credit
      • Housing
      • Oil
      • Europe
      • Asia
    • Market Fundamentals
    • Live Dashboards
      • Employment
      • Wages and Salaries
      • GDP, Production & Sales
      • Money & Prices
      • Housing
      • Consumers
      • Business Credit
      • Trade
    Fed Dashboard
    You are at:Home»Business Credit»Investors, be alert for these two credit trends

    Investors, be alert for these two credit trends

    0
    By Brian Barnier on August 16, 2016 Business Credit, Market Fundamentals

    Risk to investors has been creeping up through two trends – the rise of autonomous financial markets and rise in commercial & industrial lending. Use the right metrics to more easily watch these risks.

     

    Let’s make this practical… What is the basis of a loan to a little retail shop? A lender looks to assets (fixtures, equipment or inventory) or flows (production, sales or income). Credit analysis expects consistent ratios such as loan-to-value, debt/assets or loan payments/income. Economy-wide, we’d also expect to see some consistency, subject to tangible changes such as mix of industries (and asset-intensity) and growth rates of companies.

    Do we see consistency in the data? No.

    Debt ratios have grown over the decades. To more easily compare over time, lending is shown relative to production as measured by Gross Domestic Product (GDP). In this view, loans and repurchase agreements are on a long upswing with corporate bonds ramping up in the 1980s as the bond market went from sleepy to psyched-up. As mortgage securities were so prominent in the housing credit bubble, Government Sponsored Enterprises (Freddie and Fannie) are shown for comparison.

    201613finassetsGDPThe corporate bond story is the risk of increasingly complex instruments of the past three decades — new automation, new rules, new contracts, and new distribution. Bonds went from trading in dusty drawers in the “Garage” of the New York Stock Exchange to being “the” hot and exciting departments of broker-dealers and big banks. This was the rise of autonomous financial markets.

    Good news, bond to GDP levels have been roughly sideways post credit crash. Bad news, that level is 2.6x the 1947-1984 level.

    “Loans and repurchase agreements” have grown for a longer period of time and are larger. What are the movers and shakers of this monster category?

    Switching to a nominal dollar view for raw comparisons, seven categories stand out.

    20160813selectloans“Other financial intermediaries” are finance companies, asset-based securities issuers and Government Sponsored Enterprises. “Private depository institutions” are banks and credit unions. “Loans not elsewhere classified” are commercial and industrial (C&I) loans, securitized loans, lease-financing and agricultural loans.

    As some loans are based on production cycle and some on assets, C&I loans are shown relative to each.

    20160813CIloansStriking is that C&I loans relative to production (Business GVA, aka Business GDP) are near historic highs.

    On a BGVA basis, lending is at its second highest point in history, far higher than at the tech or mortgage bubble peaks. On an asset basis, it is higher than the top of the mortgage bubble.

    Good news: For companies seeking loans, contrary to headlines, C&I lending is strong in aggregate, despite many companies struggling for credit.

    Caution: Are loan-to-value ratios too high? Including bonds, are debt/equity ratios too high?

    Debt/equity ratios must be considered in view of recent capital structure shifts. Lower cost of capital and higher earnings per share are sought by companies such as Quanta Services, Motorola Solutions, American Airlines, Corning, H&R Block, Express Scripts and Harley-Davidson with large share repurchases and issuance of debt. Today total debt/total equity ratios have been growing post-credit crash, with wide differences by industry.

    Debt/equity ratios are also at historic highs other than around when the credit bubble burst.

    20160813ZRSDbtEqFor more on debt/equity ratios and company-level differences see “How to separate company financing games from value creation.”

    Investor insight:

    • Investors and traders should be alert to the market risk of this overall debt level – as we wrote regarding business cycles, deleveraging was aborted.
    • Fundamental investors should be alert to credit risk in companies. This includes checking debt/equity ratios and loan capacity, especially when comparing peer companies, and using capital structure-neutral measures of valuation.

     

    Data Geek Notes:

    • Data are for financial business, do not include 1) monetary authority or 2) household and nonprofit sector (including pensions and endowments) or financial firms classified as their intermediaries (e.g., hedge funds).
    • Business Gross Value Added (GVA) is roughly business sales minus inventory. It is another name for Business Sector GDP.
    • Repos, or Security repurchase agreements, are shown gross, transactions between depository institutions are not netted out.
    • “Loans and repurchase agreements” is series FLxx4041005 that is labeled “Short term” in the Financial Accounts tables. However, loans of all maturities actually sum into that time series.
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleMeasuring your safety – and Fed’s footprint – with margin debt
    Next Article Your quick guide to spotting bubbles

    Related Posts

    Destructive Debt is Different

    NEW READERS – START HERE for Top Charts

    How to get over 90% of your returns with less stress – start with macro

    Comments are closed.

    Recent Posts
    • Are central bankers asking the right questions about “inflation?”
    • The Future of the Central Bank
    • Memo to Fed: Stop worrying about “inflation” beyond monetary control
    • Memo to Fed: Don’t mess with Mother Nature’s interest rates
    • Japan: Time to shift gears to climb to the next level of growth
    Categories
    • Asia
    • Business Credit
    • Consumer Credit
    • Employment
    • Europe
    • Exponential Tech
    • GDP
    • Housing
    • Imports & Exports
    • Market Fundamentals
    • Money & Prices
    • Oil
    • Production
    • Productivity
    • Wages & Salaries
    Categories
    About Us
    • Our Purpose
    • Editorial Board
    • Thank you / Credit
    • Contact our writers
    • Disclaimer and Privacy
    © 2014-2023 Fed Dashboard & Fundamentals, a public service of ValueBridge Advisors, LLC

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.