Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Trending
    • Are central bankers asking the right questions about “inflation?”
    • The Future of the Central Bank
    • Memo to Fed: Stop worrying about “inflation” beyond monetary control
    • Memo to Fed: Don’t mess with Mother Nature’s interest rates
    • Japan: Time to shift gears to climb to the next level of growth
    • Japan: Households shine in 2Q2018 – watch three threats to exports and households
    • Newest inflation report – 3 secrets revealed
    • No, productivity is not widely weak. Companies are dynamic.
    Fed Dashboard
    • Home
    • About Us
      • Our Purpose
      • Editorial Board
      • Thank you / Credit
      • Contact our writers
    • Economic Analysis
      • Employment
      • Wages & Salaries
      • Productivity
      • GDP
      • Production
      • Money & Prices
      • Exponential Tech
      • Imports & Exports
      • Consumer Credit
      • Business Credit
      • Housing
      • Oil
      • Europe
      • Asia
    • Market Fundamentals
    • Live Dashboards
      • Employment
      • Wages and Salaries
      • GDP, Production & Sales
      • Money & Prices
      • Housing
      • Consumers
      • Business Credit
      • Trade
    Fed Dashboard
    You are at:Home»Employment»From gliding growth back to frozen fifties

    From gliding growth back to frozen fifties

    0
    By Brian Barnier on May 29, 2014 Employment, GDP, Wages & Salaries

    29 May 2014

    Digging behind the numbers in “Measures to know of healthy jobs and paychecks” (April 23, 2014) aspired to clarify several points, including:

    • U-3 unemployment rate (Official) does not consistently track with U-6 unemployment rate (Total unemployed, plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force, plus total employed part time for economic reasons)
    • Job quality (in terms of total hours, skill level, permanence and wages) matters. A job lost in a long term health care facility is not fully recovered by a home health care worker and a job in hospitality does not equal a job in high-skill manufacturing.
    • A “pocketbook” measure is Real Wages and Salaries per working age person (adjusting for inflation with Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers). It’s personal. It touches people’s paychecks. This view revealed average real paychecks on another plateau since 1999, modestly growing from 2010 back up to 1999 levels.

    The Unemployment-Income curve brings together both the job count and dollar views in a picture of the changing relationship over time between the U-3 official unemployment rate and real (inflation-adjusted) Disposable Personal Income (income minus income taxes) per person.

    Reductions in the official unemployment rate haven’t been associated with so little real Disposable Personal Income (DPI) per person growth since the 1950s.

    • Substantively, this echoes concern about poor quality job recovery.
    • Measurement-wise, because U-3 and real DPI per person do not have a stable association, U-3 is not a good overall indicator of this aspect of job market health.

    In economic health terms, Real Wages & Salaries (as opposed to employment counts, or hourly or weekly earnings) in total is powerful because of how it helps or hurts the cycle of consumption that feeds business sales, that feeds wages and salaries, that feeds consumption that feed business sales, and so on.

    unemp-inc curve 052014 Reasons for falling back into the “frozen fifties” are discussed in the Economic Picture Book.

    One of these – global wage and capacity pressures – is discussed in the “6 dots to help you tell the story of US imports and job pressures” (15 April 2014)

    The unemployment-income curve helpfully makes clear that:

    • Broader measures of job market health are needed for better decisions in policy and investments
    • In our current situation, the pocketbook measure is especially important

    Note:

    • Real DPI is disposable personal income adjusted to constant dollars by the implicit price deflator for personal consumption expenditures (chained 1996 dollars).
    • Population is the total population of the United States (including armed forces overseas and institutional). Both are used by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) in its calculation of Real DPI per capital in Series A229RX in NIPA Section 2 (Tab 209 Month.)

     

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleMarket value – why P/E might not be what you think it is
    Next Article 3 insights from the Real Rates – Real People Curve

    Related Posts

    Japan: Stop misreading the data. Start seeing opportunity.

    Another theory goes “poof” – labor doesn’t limit growth like it used to

    Destructive Debt is Different

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Recent Posts
    • Are central bankers asking the right questions about “inflation?”
    • The Future of the Central Bank
    • Memo to Fed: Stop worrying about “inflation” beyond monetary control
    • Memo to Fed: Don’t mess with Mother Nature’s interest rates
    • Japan: Time to shift gears to climb to the next level of growth
    Categories
    • Asia
    • Business Credit
    • Consumer Credit
    • Employment
    • Europe
    • Exponential Tech
    • GDP
    • Housing
    • Imports & Exports
    • Market Fundamentals
    • Money & Prices
    • Oil
    • Production
    • Productivity
    • Wages & Salaries
    Categories
    About Us
    • Our Purpose
    • Editorial Board
    • Thank you / Credit
    • Contact our writers
    • Disclaimer and Privacy
    © 2014-2023 Fed Dashboard & Fundamentals, a public service of ValueBridge Advisors, LLC

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.