Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Trending
    • Are central bankers asking the right questions about “inflation?”
    • The Future of the Central Bank
    • Memo to Fed: Stop worrying about “inflation” beyond monetary control
    • Memo to Fed: Don’t mess with Mother Nature’s interest rates
    • Japan: Time to shift gears to climb to the next level of growth
    • Japan: Households shine in 2Q2018 – watch three threats to exports and households
    • Newest inflation report – 3 secrets revealed
    • No, productivity is not widely weak. Companies are dynamic.
    Fed Dashboard
    • Home
    • About Us
      • Our Purpose
      • Editorial Board
      • Thank you / Credit
      • Contact our writers
    • Economic Analysis
      • Employment
      • Wages & Salaries
      • Productivity
      • GDP
      • Production
      • Money & Prices
      • Exponential Tech
      • Imports & Exports
      • Consumer Credit
      • Business Credit
      • Housing
      • Oil
      • Europe
      • Asia
    • Market Fundamentals
    • Live Dashboards
      • Employment
      • Wages and Salaries
      • GDP, Production & Sales
      • Money & Prices
      • Housing
      • Consumers
      • Business Credit
      • Trade
    Fed Dashboard
    You are at:Home»Exponential Tech»Read between the lines to solve the productivity mystery

    Read between the lines to solve the productivity mystery

    0
    By Brian Barnier on April 10, 2015 Exponential Tech, Market Fundamentals, Production, Productivity

    10 April 2015

    Decreases in labor productivity have been puzzling. Investment in Private Structures is the fixed asset type that has dropped most relative to hours worked. This matters because at any output level, if assets are lower compared to hours worked, productivity drops. For investors, understanding the implications helps spot opportunities.

    Labor Productivity is output divided by hours worked. At Q42014, output was down and hours worked up. Thus, productivity – the space between the lines – fell.

    30032015NFbusprodOn average, the space between the lines – productivity — is smaller after the credit bubble burst than between the bursts of the dot com and credit bubbles. What’s changed?

    As the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) notes, Labor Productivity reflects “…many influences, including changes in technology; capital investment; level of output; utilization of capacity, energy, and materials; the organization of production; managerial skill; and the characteristics and effort of the work force.” This is the space between the lines.

    Structures stall amidst structural shifts

    Expanding on “Y2K – When workers hit the wall” and other analyses, we now peer into types and amounts of assets through the lens of the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA).

    The BEA has three buckets of fixed assets: equipment, structures and intellectual property products. The share of each in an industry varies dramatically. For example, in 2013 (most recent annual data available), intellectual property products are less than 2% in food service and over 80% in publishing (including software). Other examples include:

    30032015fassetFor labor productivity, the data detective question is, “How does the quantity of each asset compare with hours worked?”

    30032015fassethoursStructures since 2007 have been growing very slowly. Relative to increasing hours worked, structures dipped. From the BEA data, most industries are weak. A few industries such as mining, durables, transportation (air, water and pipeline) and food services are growing strongly.

    Why are structures struggling? A frequently cited shorter term cause is lack of confidence. Cutbacks in oil and gas projects are examples. Longer term causes include technology. For example, power plants and data centers have extra floor space as the physical size of productive equipment shrinks. Even factories for fixed-sized products, such as cars, can be redesigned for efficiency.

    How long has capacity been increasing?

    Productive capacity grows with exponential technology

    Capacity utilization measures are provided by the Federal Reserve Board. While rising and falling with economic conditions, utilization has been on a downtrend since 1967 – falling from nearly 89% to nearly 80% as of 4Q2104. Industries vary widely. Today, textile is at about 68%, and oil and gas extraction is over 95%. Electric power capacity has been considered a barometer — it has fallen from near 100% in 1998-2000 to about 80%.

    30032015caputilEconomy of ideas

    What’s the spark for this exponential technology that grows capacity? Generally called “innovation,” it is measured to some degree in Intellectual Property Products. This concept is also called the economy of ideas. The emphasis is on idea because an idea can quickly jump to finished product via exponential technology. This capacity is measured in creative brain space rather than manufacturing plant space. This is explored at organizations such as Singularity University.

    As the BLS definition notes, some “between the lines” influences are related to organization, especially management method. The creation and change to new management methods is itself a management method.

    Measurement matters

    Productivity measures are affected by how services and materials are sourced. When sourced from outside of a company, industry or country those hours worked move to a different accounting bucket and thus appear to improve labor productivity. Sourcing from other countries includes both technology and less costly labor using technology. The import influences are measured by the BEA as described in the “Red Dots” story. Bringing work back in-house lowers measured productivity.

    Multiple data sources are needed to see between the lines. Here, BLS, BEA, Fed, Census and SEC (via Zacks Research System) data are blended.

    For investors, superior insight into company productivity creates opportunity

    Companies – including direct competitors — differ in shifting between working hours or fixed assets. For example, one company may be adding workers to fix problems created by excessive cost-cutting whereas another is adding workers to expand use of available factory capacity.

    Investors can find opportunity in causes of differences.

    • Positives are the creation and use of signature strengths that add people. These initially decrease measured productivity.
    • Negatives include “lean” corporate initiatives that cut too deeply forcing more risk onto investors – in addition to strained share price levels. These initially increase measured productivity.

    For investors, the question is whether a cause has sound strategic reasons or just earnings engineering (any earnings divided by fewer assets will boost Return on Assets).

    Insight for action comes from business model investing methods such as the 4Rs using tools such as Zacks Research System to understand sales submarines and cash flow relative to fixed investment.

    Summary

    We do:

    • Not need to fear lower productivity that is the result of long term asset shifting, or growth in hours worked reflecting economic confidence or better management.
    • Need to be cautious of distorting policy and management gimmicks.
    • Need to understand the dynamics of the idea economy, exponential technology and related trends.

    Analyzing the shifting asset mix provides pointers for investigating company business models. The more diverse are companies, the more business models matter to investing.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleAvoiding sales submarines that submerge S&P500
    Next Article From earnings to economic releases – you can profit from knowing how numbers add up

    Related Posts

    No, productivity is not widely weak. Companies are dynamic.

    Investors, labor productivity is not widely weak; business models matter more

    Labor productivity gets trumped by ROI

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Recent Posts
    • Are central bankers asking the right questions about “inflation?”
    • The Future of the Central Bank
    • Memo to Fed: Stop worrying about “inflation” beyond monetary control
    • Memo to Fed: Don’t mess with Mother Nature’s interest rates
    • Japan: Time to shift gears to climb to the next level of growth
    Categories
    • Asia
    • Business Credit
    • Consumer Credit
    • Employment
    • Europe
    • Exponential Tech
    • GDP
    • Housing
    • Imports & Exports
    • Market Fundamentals
    • Money & Prices
    • Oil
    • Production
    • Productivity
    • Wages & Salaries
    Categories
    About Us
    • Our Purpose
    • Editorial Board
    • Thank you / Credit
    • Contact our writers
    • Disclaimer and Privacy
    © 2014-2023 Fed Dashboard & Fundamentals, a public service of ValueBridge Advisors, LLC

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.