Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Trending
    • Are central bankers asking the right questions about “inflation?”
    • The Future of the Central Bank
    • Memo to Fed: Stop worrying about “inflation” beyond monetary control
    • Memo to Fed: Don’t mess with Mother Nature’s interest rates
    • Japan: Time to shift gears to climb to the next level of growth
    • Japan: Households shine in 2Q2018 – watch three threats to exports and households
    • Newest inflation report – 3 secrets revealed
    • No, productivity is not widely weak. Companies are dynamic.
    Fed Dashboard
    • Home
    • About Us
      • Our Purpose
      • Editorial Board
      • Thank you / Credit
      • Contact our writers
    • Economic Analysis
      • Employment
      • Wages & Salaries
      • Productivity
      • GDP
      • Production
      • Money & Prices
      • Exponential Tech
      • Imports & Exports
      • Consumer Credit
      • Business Credit
      • Housing
      • Oil
      • Europe
      • Asia
    • Market Fundamentals
    • Live Dashboards
      • Employment
      • Wages and Salaries
      • GDP, Production & Sales
      • Money & Prices
      • Housing
      • Consumers
      • Business Credit
      • Trade
    Fed Dashboard
    You are at:Home»Business Credit»Fed’s liftoff failsafe — “Cap and lift”

    Fed’s liftoff failsafe — “Cap and lift”

    0
    By Brian Barnier on October 11, 2015 Business Credit, Money & Prices, Wages & Salaries

    The Fed is in a bad spot. Conventional wisdom says rates are low. But it’s only some rates. Yield spreads for medium-quality, investment grade corporate bonds are at historical highs. Raising the Federal Funds rate might add strain. Yet, to the extent the recent spikes reflect “liftoff lightheadedness” and mix of Fed’s Treasury holdings; the Fed might have a safety valve – “cap and lift.”

     

    Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen offered a “cautionary note” when she remarked, “…significant uncertainty attaches to Phillips curve predictions, and the validity of forecasts from this model must be continuously evaluated in response to incoming data.” We agree.

    The Phillips Curve traditional measures are not the best measure for today’s questions:

    • Job counts on the horizontal axis hide insight on income quality of jobs.
    • Interest rate on the vertical axis misses changes in spreads between rates targeted by the Fed and rates felt more widely.

    Today, “pocketbook measure” matters more than job counts

    In “3 insights from the Real Rates – Real People Curve,” we suggested a better measure of employment health is the “pocketbook measure,” real wages and salaries per person.

    The pocketbook view reveals shifts in real wages per person that can’t be seen in job counts. The pocketbook measure makes it easy to see 3 spurts of real wages per person growth since 4Q1998.

    The first 2 spurts reflect the dot com and credit bubbles — that collapsed.

    For the third spurt, a question is whether it will: 1) stagnate until Fed’s shrinking balance sheet is offset by tangible growth or 2) continue to grow reflecting the PIPE Factors or other tangible cause.

    In the Real Rates – Real People versions of the Phillips curve, each bump jolts us to see how job quality is affected by more than interest rates.

    20151005rratesrpeopleThe pocketbook measures for the first two quarters of 2015 were both above the previous high in 2007; although Q2 was lower than Q1. Monthly data for July and August both show growth.

    Today, relative rates matter more than Federal Funds Rate

    Relative rates to wider borrowers are helpful measures of economic pulse. This is done by starting with Moody’s Baa Constant Maturity Seasoned Corporate Bond and then using the 30 year U.S. Treasury to normalize for inflation, risk-free rate and duration.

    Conventional wisdom says we’re living in low rate land.

    Not entirely true. It turns out the Baa-30UST spread is historically high other than 3 spikes.

    Today’s spread is 2.6 times that of the mid-1990s.

    20151005relrealratesSpread has been increasing since August 2014 across maturities. Spreads are at historical highs since 1953 other than 3-5 spikes.

    20151005spreads

    Why high spreads? Markets might be ignoring the Fed, over-anticipating it, responding to tighter bank regulation or coping with the Fed’s mix of Treasury holdings.

    It’s bad for borrowers whether spreads continue growing or the Fed Funds increase is merely passed on.

    Fed’s launch sequence fears

    The Fed’s bad spot is how to BOTH raise rates AND overcome the spike in spreads. The spread spikes seem related to broader “liftoff lightheadedness,” including foreign exchange rates.

    The Fed’s failsafe might lie in clearly communicating the natural interest rate has decreased – providing fresh air for lightheadedness and capping expectations of eventual rates.

    Such a “Cap and lift” approach might strike the balance.

    Until then, investors benefit by clearly separating tangible causes from market uncertainty – uncertainty swings on nervous news, tangibles endure.

     

    Data Geek Notes:

    • For the seasoned Baa corporate bond measure, the St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank notes, “Moody’s tries to include bonds with remaining maturities as close as possible to 30 years. Moody’s drops bonds if the remaining life falls below 20 years, if the bond is susceptible to redemption, or if the rating changes.”
    • September estimate of real wages and salaries per person was created from related monthly data through August.
    • The 30 year U.S. Treasury bond time series has a gap from 2002-2005 when those bonds were not offered. Because the 10 year has continuous data since 1955, it is often used for spread analysis; weakness is that duration is not matched. The September Baa-10UST spread is also at historical highs other than spikes.
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleSlide, bump and slick — What you need to know about exports
    Next Article Equity risk premiums – not magic, just monetary

    Related Posts

    Are central bankers asking the right questions about “inflation?”

    The Future of the Central Bank

    Memo to Fed: Stop worrying about “inflation” beyond monetary control

    Comments are closed.

    Recent Posts
    • Are central bankers asking the right questions about “inflation?”
    • The Future of the Central Bank
    • Memo to Fed: Stop worrying about “inflation” beyond monetary control
    • Memo to Fed: Don’t mess with Mother Nature’s interest rates
    • Japan: Time to shift gears to climb to the next level of growth
    Categories
    • Asia
    • Business Credit
    • Consumer Credit
    • Employment
    • Europe
    • Exponential Tech
    • GDP
    • Housing
    • Imports & Exports
    • Market Fundamentals
    • Money & Prices
    • Oil
    • Production
    • Productivity
    • Wages & Salaries
    Categories
    About Us
    • Our Purpose
    • Editorial Board
    • Thank you / Credit
    • Contact our writers
    • Disclaimer and Privacy
    © 2014-2023 Fed Dashboard & Fundamentals, a public service of ValueBridge Advisors, LLC

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.