25 July 2014
In the mystery of labor force restructuring, the “Part Rate” is often misunderstood. Understanding differences in worker groups, especially by age, can improve financial planning and public policy.
Cleaning out the cobwebs starts by clarifying that the “Part Rate” has nothing to do with employers and employees parting ways.
Civilian Labor Force Participation Rate (“Rate” to save words in this post) is the number of persons classified as Employed plus Unemployed but looking for a job divided by the Civilian Noninstitutional Population.
The Rate is an estimate based on the Current Population Survey (CPS). CPS is a monthly survey of a sample of about 60,000 eligible households conducted by the Bureau of Census for the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
The Rate has drawn attention because it is falling, thus reducing the labor force and thus resulting in an unemployment rate lower than it would have been if the Rate was more stable.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) provides several breakouts of the data.
In race/ethnicity, the participation of both Black/African American and White populations are gradually falling. By contrast, Asian and Hispanic or Latino populations seem to be stabilizing. Caution: charts have varying axes to see pattern in a small size. Not Seasonally Adjusted (causing the quarterly squiggles). As with all employment survey data, especially household survey, trend is more useful than monthly changes.
By age, the two younger groups fell, then stabilized post-crash. The 55+ group grew then stabilized post-crash. The largest group, 25-54 has been falling post crash. Caution: Vertical axes different scale to show detail in small charts.
By education, the most stability is in the least educated. Caution: Vertical axes do not start at zero. Not Seasonally Adjusted. BLS provides a range of other views by native or foreign born, disability and veteran status. Caution: Vertical axis does not start at zero. Not Seasonally Adjusted.
This data can be analyzed more through tables for clarity on the “who” and through behavioral surveys for clarity on the “why.” Academic analysis can vary widely. For this short post and because we like pictures, we’ll stop here.
- Trends are broadly down EXCEPT for the youngest, oldest and least educated participants (employed and unemployed)
- Growth in participants age 65+ is notable
- As with other un/employment count data, limitations of count data point to the need to focus on the “pocketbook measure” — Real Wages and Salaries per Person – as described in Measures to know of healthy jobs and paychecks (23 April 2014)
- These trends plus changes in pension plans, savings rates, student debt, consumer debt and more require very different discussions with family members and retirement advisors. The emphasis is on life choices, not just savings choices.
Note: Because rates are sensitive to definitions, the BLS CPS specifics are http://www.bls.gov/bls/glossary.htm :
- Employed — Persons 16 years and over in the civilian noninstitutional population who, during the reference week, (a) did any work at all (at least 1 hour) as paid employees; worked in their own business, profession, or on their own farm, or worked 15 hours or more as unpaid workers in an enterprise operated by a member of the family; and (b) all those who were not working but who had jobs or businesses from which they were temporarily absent because of vacation, illness, bad weather, childcare problems, maternity or paternity leave, labor-management dispute, job training, or other family or personal reasons, whether or not they were paid for the time off or were seeking other jobs. Each employed person is counted only once, even if he or she holds more than one job. Excluded are persons whose only activity consisted of work around their own house (painting, repairing, or own home housework) or volunteer work for religious, charitable, and other organizations.
Unemployed — Persons aged 16 years and older who had no employment during the reference week, were available for work, except for temporary illness, and had made specific efforts to find employment sometime during the 4-week period ending with the reference week. Persons who were waiting to be recalled to a job from which they had been laid off need not have been looking for work to be classified as unemployed.